A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2019, the Defendant reported 112 in the vicinity of Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, a member B, on April 14:45 and 15:15, and demanded a police officer to leave the hospital to a hospital. However, the police officer stated that the police officer would stop the vehicle on behalf of the police officer, and that the police officer would stop the vehicle, and that the police officer would stop the vehicle on the front of the patrol road, and sprink the Ethmb to stop it, and assault the police officer’s chest to stop it, and continue to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in charge of handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the part of a police officer dispatched for the defendant is inferior to the use of violence, but there is no other penalty force except for the crime of interference with business);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;