logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2014.11.28 2014가합101111
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established under the Korea Housing Finance Corporation Act to promote the long-term and stable supply of housing finance, etc. by carrying out the securitization of mortgage-backed claims, etc. and the housing finance credit guarantee business, and to contribute to the promotion of the welfare of citizens and the development of the national economy, and the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund is established within the Plaintiff

[The Act on the Assistance to Residential Stability and Lump Sum-Raising Savings for Former Workers (hereinafter “Housing Stabilization Act”)]

(B) The Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund established under the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund Act was operated and managed by the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, which was in force on March 1, 2004, was repealed by the Housing Finance Corporation Act, and the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under the former Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund Act was deemed to be the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under Article 55 of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation Act, and the contributions to the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund Act and the credit guarantee and other legal acts were deemed to have been conducted under the said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply).

1) B of September 30, 1994, the Jungbu General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “midbu General Construction”) shall enter into an apartment sale contract.

) and ASEAN-si C ground D Apartment 101, 1409 (hereinafter “instant 1 apartment”)

(2) On July 8, 1994, the Defendant concluded a sales contract with the content that the purchase price of the apartment was KRW 70,950,000, with the content that the purchase price was to be sold in KRW 70,950,000. The Defendant’s Intervenor concluded a sales contract with the content that the sale contract was to be sold in KRW 70,950,00 in the sale price of the apartment and KRW 101,706 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

3. On the other hand, on November 13, 1993, the defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the duty of completion of the above D Apartment which was executed by the Jungbu General Construction.

arrow