logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.03 2015가단5334734
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 24,786,351 and KRW 24,729,941 among them, Defendant A shall be from June 11, 2015 to August 31, 2015.

Reasons

1. Following the facts of recognition are as follows: ① the Defendants’ confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act between the Plaintiff, Defendant A, D, F, and G; ② there is no dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B; ③ the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and E may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the evidence Nos. 1 through 14, 15-1 through 7, and 16.

The plaintiff's status is a corporation established under the Korea Housing Finance Corporation Act with the aim of facilitating the long-term stable supply of housing finance, etc. by carrying out the securitization of mortgage-backed claims, housing finance credit guarantee and reverse annuity mortgage guarantee business, and contributing to the promotion of the welfare of the people and the development of the national economy.

The Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund established and operated under the former Act on the Assistance to Residential Stability and Residential Support of Workers (hereinafter “Housing Stabilization Act”), but the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund in force on March 1, 2004 was repealed by the Housing Finance Corporation Act, and the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under the Housing Stabilization Act was deemed to be the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under Article 55 of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation Act, and the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund Act was deemed to have been invested in the Housing Finance Credit Guarantee Fund under the Housing Finance Corporation Act, credit guarantee, and other legal acts were deemed to have been conducted under the Housing Finance Corporation Act, and entrusted its business to financial institutions

B. (i) The conclusion of the credit guarantee agreement is made by the Defendant A to our bank, an institution entrusted with the Plaintiff’s business, which is the Plaintiff’s business, to guarantee the repayment of the principal and interest of the loan when obtaining the Workers’ House Lease Fund from our Bank (hereinafter “Korea Bank”).

arrow