Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

except that, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:30 on June 28, 2015, Defendant A brought an dispute with Defendant A’s friendship E in front of the D main shop located in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun. The Defendant took a bath to the police officer who belongs to the Hongsung Police Station F District Unit, who was dispatched to the site after having received a report of a witness, and received a request from Defendant A to speak that he would not take a bath at the security guards belonging to the said district group, and made a threat as he did with the above H’s flat, flat the chest’s flat, flat the chest’s flat, and flat the chest’s flat, who was flated by the Defendant and the Defendant at the middle of the above H, thereby interfering with the performance of duties of police officers by making a report of flating the external flat of the said G group’s flat as his flat, and thereby obstructing the performance of duties of police officers.

2. Defendant B committed assault, at the time and place described in paragraph (1), on the ground that he was arrested by a flagrant offender under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, such as Paragraph (1), and on the ground that he obstructed the arrest of a flagrant offender, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of duties regarding the arrest of a police officer, by committing assaulting other police officers in the field, such as keeping the body of a police officer G police officer, who is a police officer at the scene, and a police officer, who is a police officer at the scene.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to H, G, and I;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Tradeal concurrence Defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Official Duties)

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: The Defendants are in violation of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A did not have any criminal record; Defendant B did not have any specific criminal record other than a fine for one time, and under the influence of alcohol.