logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.10.23 2019고단2165
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On October 19, 2018, around 11:17, the Defendant used the victim’s face at the entrance of the D week located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, to go to the victim E (the victim is 35 years of age) and assaulted the victim with a qui, who is a part of the victim’s face.

B. On October 19, 2018, at the same place as the preceding paragraph of the preceding paragraph, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) in a place where: (b) around October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (c) was aware of the head debt of the G in question; and (d) continued to injure the face face of the J in the process of arresting the FJ in question, in order for the Defendant to arrest the FJ as an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. On October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the Djuju located in Busan, Busan, on October 11:25, 2018, the Defendant: (b) arrested a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Busan, who was committing an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties, and (c) opened the F District Unit of the Busan, to visit the said K as an offender committing an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties; (d) opened the patrol vehicle to have the said A go to the patrol vehicle; and (e) obstructed the patrol officer belonging to the same district unit to stop this; and (e) committed an assault, such as cutting off L, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to M, E, N, G, K, L, and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (afixture), investigation report (CCTV);

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of assault)

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Code

1. Articles 40 and 50 (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each fine (the defendant has no particular power, and considering that the defendant reflects the crime in this case) ;

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant A);

arrow