beta
Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, Appellant
The head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government
Conclusion of Pleadings
October 6, 2009
The first instance judgment
Suwon District Court Decision 2008Guhap9684 Decided February 16, 2009
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance court shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposition of acquisition tax of 39,614,010 won, registration tax of 16,006,280 won, local education tax of 2,941,810 won, special rural development tax of 3,502,880 won shall be revoked on June 11, 2007.
Reasons
The court's explanation of this case is identical to each corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Ahn Young-chul (Presiding Judge)