Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, Appellant
Korea Labor Welfare Corporation
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 10, 2009
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2008Gudan12101 Decided May 12, 2009
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant revoked the disposition not to grant medical care to the plaintiff on January 3, 2008.
Reasons
The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is that the plaintiff did not work every day at the construction site of this case between the third party 18 and 19, and the plaintiff did not work every day at the construction site of this case and 8 days on October 2007 and 5 days on November 2007 and other construction sites from time to time, and other construction sites from time to time." The additional evidence submitted at the trial, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, are the same as the reasons for the court's decision of the first instance, except for the rejection of each statement in Gap 30 to 34 evidence (including each number) which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Ahn Young-chul (Presiding Judge)