beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The Defendant, “2015 Godan 986, 2010, the Defendant, as the head of the Da (E’s branch office) mobile phone agent located in Gyeongnam-gun Da (E) from early 2010 to September 2012, was delegated by F, the operator of the above E, with the duties of new mobile phone purchase, sale, change of equipment, etc.
1. Forging a private document;
A. The Defendant: (a) opened an additional mobile phone using a copy of his identification card received from those who want to open a mobile phone in the above D; (b) was in possession of the said D agency office around July 5, 201; and (c) held the said D agency office.
G sent a copy of G’s identification card to F by facsimile, and sent it to F as a new subscriber, and let F without knowledge of the fact enter the name of the mobile phone service contract, “G”, “H” and “G” in the name column of the short-term installment transaction contract.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant set the new contract for mobile phone service in G name, which is a private document on the duty of rights, and the contract for short-term installment trading.
B. Around May 1, 2012, the Defendant was in possession of the foregoing D agency office.
The I sent a copy of his identification card to F by facsimile and sent it to F as a new subscriber, and let F without knowledge of the fact enter F in the name column of a new mobile phone service contract, a short-term installment contract, “I”, “J”, and “I” in the customer column.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant set up a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of I, which is a private document on the duty of rights, or a contract for short-term installment trading.
2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;
A. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place, and at No. 1-A, had F submit a forged mobile phone service contract and a short-term installment trading contract to F as if they were genuinely formed with the employees of the LGT agency who knew of such fact.
B. The defendant set forth in 1-B.