logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.06.23 2016가합100206
기타(금전)
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 223,338,755 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from January 18, 2017 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 1, 2006, the Plaintiff concluded a construction contract (hereinafter “the instant construction contract”) with the Defendant setting the construction period as “A Corporation” from June 5, 2006 to June 4, 2008 (730 days from the commencement date) and the contract amount as “645,274,920 won” (hereinafter “the instant construction contract”).

B. After concluding the instant construction contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a modified contract with the content that the contract amount is modified and the construction period is extended, and the specific details of the modification are as follows.

On June 1, 2006, June 1, 2006: 645,274,920 on June 4, 2008; 653,615,00 compensation delay; 615,00 on March 3, 2009; 63. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. - 653,615,00 on March 3, 201; 6. 3. 6. - 6. 3. 6. 6. 6. 3. 6. 15,00 on March 3, 200; 3. 6. 1. 6. 6. 1. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 206. 3. 1. 3. 206. 3. 6. 3. 206. 3. 2015 ; 6. 1. 6. 6. 1. 6. 1. 2. 3. 8. - 6. 1. 6. 1. 2. 3. 8. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1.

C. On May 18, 2015, the Plaintiff claimed indirect expenses against the Defendant on the ground that the requirements for indirect expenses for air extension were met. However, on May 26, 2015, the Defendant returned to the Defendant on the ground that “the construction site agent must stay at the construction site according to the general conditions of the construction contract, but did not reside at the construction site at the construction site later, and did not perform the construction-related work, and the relevant statutes stipulate the settlement of actual expenses, but the examination of the scope of adjustment of the contract amount due to air extension, etc. is not possible.”

arrow