1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 1, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) under which the term “A” was fixed as contract amounting to KRW 645,274,920, and the construction period from June 5, 2006 to June 4, 2008 (730 days from the commencement date of construction) (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

B. After that, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract to modify the contract amount or the construction period, and the details of the modification are as follows.

. On June 1, 2006. 6. 1. 6. 4. 6. 6. 8, 200, 645, 274, 920, 1 May 30, 2008; 3. 8,340, 653, 615,000 compensation; 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 6. 3. 8, 206. 1. 6. 3. 6. 6. 6. 3. 8, 206. 1. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 3. 1, 2015; 6. 3. 1. 6. 6. 3. 1, 2015 ; 1. 6. 1. 6. 6. 3. 6. 6. 1. 2. 6. 3. 1. 6. 2. 3. 3. 1. 8. 1. ; 2. 1.

C. On May 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for indirect costs for the extension of the period, but the Defendant returned on May 26, 2015, on the ground that “the construction site agent must reside at the construction site according to the general terms and conditions of the construction contract, but did not reside at the construction site in the construction site in the future, and did not perform the construction-related work at the construction site in the future, and the relevant statutes stipulate the actual cost settlement, but it is impossible to review the scope of settlement of the contract amount due to the extension of the period, etc.,

The plaintiff on July 2015.