The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant became aware of the Victim D (the name, the age, the age of 21) (the name, the age of 21) who had worked as a part-time worker at the Gyeongsan apartment model house C, from October 31, 2016, when he had become aware of the fact that he worked as a part-time worker.

1. 피고인은 2016. 11. 2. 10:00 경 위 아파트 모델하우스에 있는 카페 테리아 휴게 실에서 손으로 피해자의 배 부위를 1회 주물러 만지고, 위 아파트 모델하우스 입구에 있는 신발장 앞에서 손으로 피해자의 배 부위를 툭 치며 ‘ 배도 없네

“Indecent act” was forced to commit an indecent act.

2. 피고인은 같은 날 11:30 경 위 아파트 모델하우스 입구에 있는 신발장 앞에서 손으로 피해자의 배 부위를 1회 툭 쳐 강제 추행 하였다.

3. The Defendant, around 13:00 on the same day, committed an indecent act by force by force only once, on the part of the victim, in order to keep the victim’s part of the ship by hand from the carpetus room located in the above apartment model lower part of the apartment.

4. At around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force, such as making one-time care of the victim’s side gate, and flaging the victim’s gate, etc., by hand, from a carpetus room located in the above apartment model lower part of the apartment house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol with respect to D;

1. Investigation report (related to on-site inspection) - Application of on-site photographs statutes;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime; the choice of each fine under Article 298 of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine of three million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 59(1)(2) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence shows the victim's intention to refuse the sentencing in consideration of the following sentencing, and the victim's indecent act was committed several times, resulting in the victim's mental shock. This led to the defendant's wrongness.