1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 9, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the visa exemption (B-1) status on October 9, 2013, and filed an application with the Defendant for the recognition of refugee on December 9, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On September 12, 2014, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case"). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence No. 1-2, Eul evidence No. 1-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the plaintiff's chrovia (Monrovia) who is a part of the chrovia (Monrovia) origin.

The father of the Plaintiff was the deceased of C (C; hereinafter referred to as “C”) which is a confidential traditional organization composed of B, in the Maryland Co., Ltd. In lieu of the noble tradition, C’s letter should be transferred to the members on behalf of his/her noble tradition, he/she must be aware of his/her life as a product with the death of his/her life, and the education and development, the culture should be refused, and C’s tradition should lead to C’s tradition.

In 209, the plaintiff was forced by the members of C to join C and succeed to private positions according to the father of C in 2009, but refused it and received verbal threats and warnings from the members of C, and around December 2010, the head of C in the knife of the members of Montreal who found the plaintiff and called Montreal.

Therefore, if the plaintiff returned to Liberia, the defendant's disposition of this case was unlawful on a different premise, even though there is a risk of persecution from the members of Liberia.

(b) the relevant legislation;