1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On September 27, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the visa exemption (B-1, 90 days of sojourn) status on September 27, 201 as a foreigner of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter referred to as “Liberia”), and filed an application for the recognition of refugee with the Defendant on December 1, 2011.

(2) On June 12, 2013, the Defendant issued a written application for refugee status to the Plaintiff on June 12, 2013 (hereinafter “instant application for refugee status”). The same shall apply to the Plaintiff’s promulgations that have sufficient grounds for persecution [the Immigration Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 20

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant on July 24, 2013, but the Defendant dismissed it on April 11, 2014.

【In the absence of dispute, there were two parts of Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 1, and 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the disposition of this case as to the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, which were part of L.U.R.D. (hereinafter "LUD") among the anti-military groups of Liberians.

B was killed by a large number of opposing forces, including members of M.O.D.E.L. (Move Management for Demmocy in Liberia, hereinafter referred to as “MAO”) during the internal army, and was killed by a opposing force at the time of the completion of internal war.

After the completion of the internal war, the Plaintiff received intimidation letters and letters from the person presumed to be the opposite party for the reason that he was the family member B or from the person presumed to be the opposite party for the reason that he was the family member B, and was subject to sacrificization from the unexied male on January 2005.

On August 2010, in addition to the plaintiff's house, an instigious person was able to commit several violences.

Therefore, the plaintiff has the risk of killing when he returns to his own country.