logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.20 2015구합53996
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. When the Plaintiff, as a national woman of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”), refused entry into the Incheon State’s supply port on September 11, 2013 and undergo an entry inspection, but on the ground that the purpose of entry is unclear, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on September 13, 2013.

B. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The Plaintiff may not be deemed to have a well-founded fear that he would suffer from persecution as prescribed in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.”

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 8, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on April 2, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertionroma and the scarma, the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff’s assertion meta (Vai), was in de facto marital relationship B and B from 2009, which were in a de facto marital relationship, and B was transferred to the sroma due to the Plaintiff’s influence around 2010.

The plaintiff was suffering from persecution because 95% or more of the members of the plaintiff's parents, etc. were the sleep from the slocks (unslocks) or the plaintiff was married the plaintiff's husband to the slocks.

The Plaintiff was residing in the Republic of Korea with his husband and wife before the clerical error, and in the Republic of Libera’s Grandland case (Grande Mounity). There were serious religious conflicts between the Grand Islamian Island and Islamic bridge, and the public order and security was not good. Therefore, the Plaintiff was unable to be protected by the Government even if he was under religious stuff.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to Liberia, the status of refugee should be recognized as the plaintiff, as it is likely to be stuffed by arbitras for religious reasons.

Therefore, the instant disposition made on a different premise is taken.

arrow