logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.09.27 2013고단1301
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 6, 2013, the Defendant’s sole criminal defendant published a letter “Am2 shall sell Am2” on the Internet Niber E car page at an unspecified place, thereby falsely stating that “The Defendant shall sell Am2 on deposit of KRW 250,000 to the victim F.”

However, even if the defendant did not have a par value 2 and received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the par value 2.

The defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 120,000 won from the victim's national bank account under his name from the victim, etc.

6. Attached Table of Crimes by July 2, 200: Provided, That in light of the records, the remittance account number No. 8 to 11 is a clerical error in I, the date and time No. 21 is a clerical error in writing on May 25, 2013, and the date and time No. 22 is an error in writing in writing

5. Since a clerical error is deemed to be a clerical error in 19. Thus, the check of crime shall be corrected to the extent above.

The total amount of 7,647,00 won was remitted and fraudulently acquired through 29 times, such as the statement.

2. On March 12, 2013, the Defendant and G published a letter stating that the Defendant sold the ice, as described in paragraph (1), at an unspecified place, and sent the false letter to the victim H who reported and contacted it, stating that “The Defendant would deposit KRW 400,000 in the face of deposit of KRW 40,000,00,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00

However, as the defendant and G did not have a parity, even if they received the above amount from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to sell the parity.

In collusion with the defendant and G, the defendant and the victim knew the victim as above, and then, they acquired 400,000 won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the G name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. against J, K, L, M, D, N,O, P, and H.

arrow