A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 28, 2018, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act was arrested as a flagrant offender on charges of assaulting D, etc. on the front day of the “C” restaurant located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

The defendant informed the police officer in charge of the on-site dispatch of personal information, and notified the name and resident registration number of E, who was in charge of in-house and in-house, and illegally used another person's resident registration number, because the defendant is likely to be aware of the defendant's fine number.

2. On April 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of assault in the G District of the Seoul Western Police Station G District located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 21, 2018; (b) requested the identification by the police officer H in charge of the Seoul Seodaemun-gu Police Station G District to confirm the identity of the Defendant; (c) caused the said H to prepare a written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender in relation to the crime of assault; and (d) stated the “E” in the confirmation column of the written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender and carried it onto the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged one copy of the certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender under the above E, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact, and around that time, issued the false certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender to the above H as if it was duly formed.

3. Around 03:10 on April 29, 2018, the Defendant was investigated as a charge of assault at the I Office of the Seoul Seodaemun Police Station in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul as a unification of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and then signed and sealed the interrogation protocol as if the Defendant was “E” at the end of the interrogation protocol as if the Defendant was “E” and presented it as genuine to J who may know of the fact.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant forged another person's private signature without authority and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;