beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On December 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two and a half years with prison labor for the crime of bodily injury, special threat to a lineal ascendant, fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the above punishment on February 26, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant causing property damage - around 14:00 on May 8, 2019, around 2019, around C 14:00, the Defendant: (a) caused the damage to the property by putting the Victim D and C with a trial cost; (b) caused the payment of food value; and (c) caused the damage to the market price by putting the bits of the Era car, which is owned by the victim who was parked at the same time, by hand, with a cell phone, and by placing the cell phone in his/her possession.
2. “The Defendant causing property damage” - around May 24, 2019, at around 08:15, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s food stores operated by the Victim G in Pakistan on May 24, 2019 to cover the repair cost of the vehicle by walking signboards and entrance doors, which are owned by the victim, on a hand, in front of food stores operated by the Victim G.
3. “2019 Highest 1963” - Fraud, intimidation.
A. A. Around 22:00 on May 21, 2019, the Defendant ordered the victim I’s H to pay the alcohol value as if he would pay the alcohol value to the victim. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the alcohol value even if he was provided with alcohol, alcohol, etc. from the victim. The Defendant was provided from the victim, that is, from the victim, he was provided with 10/10 of the victim’s market value of 200,000 and 10 of 10,000, and 2 of 10,000,000. Accordingly, on June 7, 2019, the Defendant by deceiving the victim and received the victim’s property. (ii) Around 01:39 on June 7, 2019, the Defendant told the victim at the destination to pay the taxi cost to the victim while boarding the victim’s M taxi on the street in front of the K market.
However, even if the victim operates a taxi to the destination, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi expenses to the victim.
The defendant has the victim operate the above taxi on the same day from the victim to the old world of the court of Eup in the same city.