logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.04.08 2016고단19
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 199] On December 7, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to the victim with alcohol and alcohol, etc. as if he were to pay the drinking value even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and then acquired it by receiving the 510,000 won in total from the damaged person, and the 510,000 won in advance.

[2016 Highest 85] On December 26, 2015, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value despite having been unable to pay the drinking value, and then acquired it by deception by being provided two bottles equivalent to the total amount of KRW 640,000 from the victim.

[2016 Highest 142] On January 3, 2016, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value despite having been unable to pay the drinking value, and acquired it by deceiving the victim by being provided with beer and alcohol equivalent to the sum of KRW 430,000 from the damaged person.

[2016 order 19]

1. On January 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 1:40 on January 5, 2016, the Defendant: (b) 11:40 on the taxi platform in front of a 3-o public toilet in front of the 3-oon public taxi platform in the 3-oon public taxi station located in the 3-oon public taxi without any intent or ability to pay taxi expenses, and (c) ran the Defendant into the cab driver in Gangwon-si police station.

was made.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to 11,800 won of taxi fee from the victim.

2. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant, on January 6, 2016, sent the same attitude that the Defendant would pay the drinking value to the victim P operated by the victim O located in Gangseo-si on January 6, 2016, even though he/she did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and the Defendant would pay the drinking value normally to the victim one concurrently.

arrow