(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.17 2017나55991

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.17 2017나55991

배당이의

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is dismissed or added, and the second part of the judgment “this court” in the 8th and 15th part of the judgment, shall be deemed to be the “Magju District Court Mapopopo.

No. 10-11 of the judgment of the first instance court, "The results of the Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd.'s response to this court's order to submit financial transaction information" is understood as "the results of the response of the Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd. to the order to submit financial transaction information

Following the fifth and sixth page of the first instance judgment, “I am in the principal place,” “The following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively considering the entire purport of pleadings as a result of the Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd.’s response to an order to submit financial transaction information at the court of first instance to the court of first instance, namely, ① the Defendant transfers KRW 81,00,000 to C in total on nine occasions from November 12, 2013 to November 13, 2013, with the number attached in the order from “1 to 9’s deposit money,” and indicated the withdrawal name in the order from “1 to 9’s deposit money,” and ② the date and time of preparation of a written confirmation of cash borrowing (No. 8’s certificate) is unclear (the Defendant asserted that he received a written confirmation of cash borrowing from C around October 25, 2013, but it is difficult to obtain the said written confirmation of cash borrowing prior to the date of lease).”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2017.09.29 2017나53049

-서울고등법원(인천) 2020.12.18 2019나14194

-서울북부지방법원 2017.12.20 2017나32082

-서울고등법원 2020.12.03 2020누43557

-서울고등법원 2018.06.14 2018나2010317