The part against the plaintiff falling under the amount ordered to be paid under the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts and the reasons why the court stated this part of the allegations by the parties are as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 4 to 4, 13) is the same with that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance ( from 2, 4, 4, 13). Thus, this part shall be cited, including summary and the attached Form,

On the 2th page of the judgment of the first instance, the Internet "Internet" is "Internet (H, Ikbook, next D's interview column, defendant's personal photograph, etc.)".

The 3rd page 4 of the first instance judgment shall be deleted.

2. Determination

A. The reasoning for the lower court’s determination on the assertion of defamation of false facts is as stated in the corresponding part of the first instance judgment (from April 16 to July 7), except for dismissal or addition as follows. As such, this part of the judgment on the assertion of defamation of false facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 5th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th 7th 8th 8th 7th 8th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8

The following shall be added between 6 pages 14 and 15 of the judgment of the first instance:

④ After the instant surgery, the Defendant’s measurement of the thickness of 24 to 26 meters on the part of the Emphere portion of the instant Hemical department was conducted by using 28 meters in the instant bulletin. The Defendant’s total inhaled 190 square meters, 530 square meters, 850 square meters in the Emphere portion, and 450 square meters in the total inhaled quantity of Emphere portion, and 850 square meters in the area of Emphere portion, which are expressed differently from the facts, by stating that the intaked local level is 530 square meters in the area of Emphere and 850 square meters in the area of Emphere portion. However, this appears to have arisen from a somewhat exaggeration of exaggeration for expressing the dissatisfaction caused by the Defendant’s mistake or the instant surgery.

⑤ The Plaintiff shall take photographs before and after the surgery with Em-type surgery.