(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.12.20 2017나32082

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.12.20 2017나32082

임대차보증금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when the judgment is used or added as follows.

2. The “witness” at the bottom of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is used or added, shall be the “witness of the first instance trial”.

At the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term "by July 2002" in the seventh line at the bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "by July 2002".

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance court, “the fact of recognition” and “(1)” are added to “the following circumstances,” which are recognized by the respective entry of evidence A Nos. 1, 4, and 5 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the response of the order to submit financial transaction information to the National Bank of Korea in the first instance court, as well as by the results of this court’s submission of the order to submit financial transaction information to the Nonghyup Bank Corporation

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (2) through (5) to the defendant.

“B. ② Around May 13, 2009, KRW 30 million out of the lease deposit paid to the Defendant was paid as a check withdrawn from the I’s National Bank account. However, it cannot be readily concluded that this is the Plaintiff’s money (at the time, I and the Defendant were living together). On May 13, 2009, the Plaintiff’s credit union account was withdrawn from KRW 45 million, but on May 12, 2009, I and C’s credit amount was stated in the account as “I early cancellation” and “F early cancellation” (it appears that the transaction details were stated in the account as “I early cancellation,” and it appears that I and C’s credit payment was not clear whether the Plaintiff paid the remainder of the lease deposit,” and on May 13, 2009, the following details were added to “the lower court’s first instance judgment’s “5” and “the following.”

(7) The I, in the course of the examination of witness by the first instance court, shall C in 2003.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.12.27 2016나37950

-서울북부지방법원 2017.07.19 2016나37875

-서울북부지방법원 2017.11.29 2016나7867

-광주고등법원(전주) 2019.04.04 2018나11577

-서울북부지방법원 2018.01.10 2017나34910