1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasons for this court’s explanation are as follows. The plaintiffs’ decision on the assertion emphasized or newly added in the trial are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part that is dismissed or added is as follows. Part 3, 12, 15, 3.

5) On the other hand, as seen below, a person infected 16 pats infections (16) who were hospitalized in the hospital like the Deceased (hereinafter “patients”) on May 31, 2015 (hereinafter “the Deceaseds”) was judged to have been confirmed to have been confirmed to have been confirmed to have been on May 31, 2015, and the Deceaseds was isolated from coconception in G hospital I on the same day, and on June 1, 2015, the body was collected from the Deceaseds around 02:30.

Each “this Court” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court is deemed to be “court of the first instance court”. Each “the result of the dispatch of documents” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court is deemed to be “the result of the dispatch of documents” in the 6th judgment, 14th, 7th, and 9th and 7th, respectively. The “the result of the dispatch of documents” in the 6th judgment is deemed to be “the result of the dispatch of documents” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court, “the result of the commission of the appraisal of documents,” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court, “the result of the dispatch of documents to the Ministry of Health and Welfare (hereinafter “the Director of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”) of the first instance court (hereinafter “the Director of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”) and the “the result of the dispatch of documents to the deceased” in the 11th judgment of the first instance court, “The deceased was unable to obtain early diagnosis from the deceased to the 6th 15th through Me and the 17th Me.

The Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act of No. 2 of the first instance trial No. 14 (hereinafter referred to as the “Communicable Prevention Act”)

"in addition."