The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The Defendant, while serving as the head of the association of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu DD reconstruction association, thought that the above reconstruction association obtained the consent of all reconstruction association members to obtain approval of the project, forged a written application for approval of the project plan and proxy proxy to obtain approval of the project.

"2014 Highest 4196"

1. Forging a private document;

A. On December 2013, the Defendant, at the office of D Housing Reconstruction Association located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, entered the consent form “12 name F, contact number G, 16 202 name H, contact number I, 16 203 J, K, and contact number L” in the written consent form for the application for the approval of the project plan using a computer at the office of D Housing Reconstruction Association located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, respectively, and had a seal in advance.

F, H, J, and K seals were affixed respectively to the consent column.

In this way, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the written consent in the name of F, H, J, and K, a private document concerning rights and obligations.

B. On July 25, 2013, the Defendant, at the office of the said D Housing Reconstruction Association, stated the proxy as “agent, proxy name J, and date of birth” on the proxy power using computers, and had a prior seal.

J has affixed his seal in the form of consent.

(2) On July 25, 2013, the Defendant, using a computer at the office of the said D Housing Reconstruction Association, stated that the proxy is “N on the power of attorney, name F, and date of birth,” and had the seal in advance.

The F's seal was stamped in the letter of consent.

(3) On September 25, 2013, the Defendant, using the computer at the office of the said D Housing Reconstruction Association, stated the proxy proxy as “the proxy proxy, nameO, date of birth P”) and had the seal in advance.

O's seal was affixed to the consent column.

(4) On December 15, 2013, the Defendant, using the computer at the office of the said D Housing Reconstruction Association, stated the proxy proxy letter as “ proxy proxy, name H, date of birth Q”) and stated in advance the proxy proxy letter.