logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고정925
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant, within Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, around October 7, 2015, set up “C residents thickness.”

The title "The Head of five-month Management Office" is that the head of five-month Management Office has been hospitalized in the hospital for more than two weeks, and that the head of the Dong and the head of the Dong and the representative of the Dong and the head of the Dong that the head of the Dong and the head of the Dong and the head of the Dong to pay the management expenses for the settlement of the apartment management expenses during the term of office of the executive officers of the mother and the head of the Dong, who have tried to engage in the management expenses for the settlement

On September 24, 2015, the warden has embezzled employee welfare expenses, and the head of the Dong gave a false testimony to the police station at the time of the briefing session on the environmental improvement on September 24, 2015. In this context, the head of the management office who embezzled public funds does not have any writing with respect to the residents, and the representative of the Dong, who received the monthly management expenses for each month from the representative, was distributed to the above C residents, and posted it on the apartment bulletin board.

On October 27, 2015, the Defendant continuously distributed the above printed matter in C and posted it on the apartment bulletin board.

However, on July 30, 2015, the defendant was found not to have been suspected of having committed a genuine case due to embezzlement of public funds against the victim D, who is the head of the above apartment management office. As a result of the investigation of the above occupational embezzlement case, it was not confirmed that the victim E and the victim F, G, H, I, I, and J, who is the head of the above apartment management office, and the victim F, G, I, I, and J, who is the representative of the above apartment management office, attempted the above D's embezzlement of public funds. There was no fact that the head of the Dong and the above victims, who were the representative of the Dong, received money from the K selected as the company for the improvement of the environment of the apartment, as the public placement expenses for the above apartment, and there was no fact that the above E made a false statement to the police station in relation to the improvement of

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. E.

arrow