The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who served as the principal of a school foundation B C high school from March 1, 2011 to August 5, 2015.

Meanwhile, although the defendant's philosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolos could not take part in philosolosolosolosolosolosolosolossolossolossolossolossolos

Accordingly, if the defendant newly establishes a philosophy subject, D can take application, abolish a father or multiple major additional points by changing the existing evaluation criteria, and grants career recognition points to a graduate school, and as above, D can pass the primary document screening. If only the primary screening is passed through the first screening, it is possible for the defendant to make D as a final successful applicant by using a way that the defendant participates in one of the two visitations and raises D interview points in comparison with other applicants, regardless of the first(documents), second(s), and second(s) of the interview from the interview from the year 2013.

I think.

On March 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought the approval of the Office of Education following deliberation by the Curriculum Committee pursuant to Article 2013-38 of the Notice of the Office of Education of Gyeonggi-do on the establishment of subjects in order to establish a philosophical subject D in the course of study; (b) however, the principal of the Department of Education heard the speech that “the majority of teachers oppose that it has no reason to open a philosophical subject at an industrial high school” from E, the Defendant prepared the minutes of the Curriculum Committee and received the approval of the Office of Education, and tried to establish a philosophical subject after obtaining the approval of the Office of Education.

Accordingly, the defendant is above the principal of the above school around April 2014.