beta
Text
The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Korea, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on June 21, 2017. On March 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Korea, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 6, 2018.
On November 23, 2017, the Defendant: “Around November 23, 2017, the 2018 Highest 656, the Defendant sent the victim C to purchase the victim’s Nowon-gu in KRW 185,000, a computer with the Internet-based site at the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangju-si B lending.”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price to the victim even if he was received from the injured party.
Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and then was handed over from the injured party around the 24th of the same month.
As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property equivalent to the market price of KRW 185,00.
"2018 Highest 756" Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangju-si B lending from the Internet to the Internet-based site at around January 15, 2018; and (b) visited the Victim D with the Internet.
In the future, the traffic books were sold at KRW 60,000.
However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods to the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 60,000 won from the victim's account in the name of the defendant.
In addition, the Defendant received the total amount of KRW 215,00 from the victims on three occasions, such as the list of crimes, from the victims until the 25th of the same month.
Accordingly, the defendant was ordered to receive money by deceiving the victims.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 656"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. C’s statement;
1. Details of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;
1. Previous conviction in judgment: Criminal history, etc.;