Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s residence in Gunsan-si B to the Internet “China-State”; (b) posted a notice of Nowon-gu North Korea’s photograph and Nowon-gu’s photograph to the effect that “Sales of 13 custody, 15 custody, etc. is made”; and (c) made a false statement to the victim C who reported and contacted the writing that “I will deposit KRW 1.2 million in the face of the State, and send the Nowon-gu Office’s door-to-door North Korea.”

However, the Defendant did not have a certain occupation or income, and did not have a sale street, and the photographs posted on the bulletin board of the above “China and China” did not have the intent or ability to send the street, which was promised to the victim, even if the Defendant sought from the victim and received the price from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and received 1.2 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (D) account under the name of the Defendant. From that time until October 13, 2016, the Defendant deceiving the victims by the same method five times in total, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Form from October 13, 2016, and was paid by the victims in total as the price for the goods.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 107,” inserted a letter on the Internet to cite that he/she sells fakes, which are not authentic, as if they were authentic, and reads that he/she would acquire money by deception.

On October 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s residence in the Gunsan-si B to the clinic of “E” at the Internet site site; (b) posted a notice on the bulletin board that “E” was sold; and (c) expressed the victim F’s intent to purchase the goods; and (d) promised to send the goods to the victim’s address using the following day if the victim F deposited KRW 250,000.

However, as long as the Defendant sold the foregoing “Patom Satom Satatn” was not a straw but a fake clothes.

Nevertheless, the defendant belongs to this.