Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for five months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months by imprisonment with labor for a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court on May 6, 2015, on the grounds that he/she had engaged in the business of arranging commercial sex acts in the “F” located in E at the Namyang-si from February 6, 2014 to June 12, 2014.

As above, the Defendant asked that “F will take place KRW 100,000,000 per month, if the Defendant continued to operate the business place in the name of the Defendant, and if it is recontrol, it would be strictly punished.” On August 2014, the Defendant asked that “F will take place the place of the business place, as if it was the owner of the business place, if it was controlled,” and that “F will take place KRW 100,000 per month in lieu of the owner of the business place.”

As above, the Defendant entered into a contract with B, and paid KRW 1 million to B each month, and when F engages in sexual traffic business in F, it was controlled by the police around October 13, 2014.

On November 3, 2014, when the Defendant was subject to an investigation at the Gyeonggi-nam Police Station for the Prevention of Commercial Sex Acts, the Defendant called to B, and asked B to make a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was subject to the police investigation by means of crackdown on the domestic commercial sex acts. BC is the president of the Republic of Korea, and it is different from the investigation. At the time of the investigation, female employees made a false statement that female employees did not engage in sexual intercourse with customers. At the last time, if a fine, etc. is imposed, they will be fully responsible.”

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the investigation officer of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station on November 5, 2014, upon the Defendant’s request, knew of the fact that the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, that the Defendant “in Korea acquired F from A and completed a new lease agreement, and operated from August 1, 2014, but did not arrange commercial sex acts. The inside Korea is the owner of F, and that A is merely a beneficiary upon request of the date of regulation.”