Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From May 8, 2013 to May 10, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., the Defendant carried out the speculative act in a manner of making three players play the game using three strawers, which is a speculative machine not classified in the E-gu operated by the Defendant located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, and allowing customers to play the game and exchanging the remaining points after the game in cash.

B. On February 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around February 15, 2013, the Defendant: (b) provided that Defendant B of the Defendant who was a pro-Japanese superior to the Defendant was running a speculative act by using the fitness machine in the Gu room; (c) as a result of multiple times of regulation, fines are often imposed; (d) the name of the head of the Gu is over four times; and (e) when enforcement is conducted, the Defendant was investigated as the owner of the business; and (e) requested that the fine be granted without the inside of the Gu and there is no particular disadvantage.

On February 15, 2012, Defendant B changed the name of the business owner of the above party branch on his/her own, and on May 10, 2013, Defendant B led to a false confession that the police officer in charge of the case was the owner of the above party branch and engaged in the speculative business on May 22, 2013.

As a result, the defendant B had the above-mentioned defendant B escape the defendant who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Around February 15, 2013, Defendant B, the head of the party branch and the head of the party branch and the head of the party branch and the head of the party branch and the head of the party branch, upon the Defendant A, engage in speculative activities using the body flag at the party branch and the head of the party branch and the head of the party branch, and upon the Defendant A’s request, the Defendant had been subject to a fine on several occasions, and if the Defendant had been subject to several times of regulation, then the Defendant was subject to four times of the party branch’s name. On the other hand, the Defendant was subject to the investigation by four times of regulation. The fine is granted without the internal framework, and there is no particular disadvantage.