Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) committed an act of arranging commercial sex acts by leasing Nos. 614 and 821 to operate a commercial sex acts establishment, employing G and H as a female of commercial sex acts on June 2014. On July 31, 2014, Defendant A provided guidance under the above 614 to receive KRW 120,00 as the price for commercial sex acts from female customers who are not in the situation of commercial sex acts and received KRW 120,00 as the price for commercial sex acts.

2. On July 31, 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B sent a phone call to Defendant B, who was aware of the fact that he/she had been engaged in sexual traffic around 21:00, to conceal the fact that he/she had been aware of the fact that he/she had been engaged in sexual traffic. On July 31, 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B asked Defendant B, who was subject to the said phone call from the first floor of the instant officetel, to “a sexual traffic business place that he/she had been in operation, was under control of police officers. It was the president. It would be subject to an investigation instead of the president. It would be possible to pay a fine on behalf of the president.” The Defendant B, who was subject to the said phone call from the first floor of the instant officetel, asked Defendant B to “It is difficult to have undergone an investigation by means of sexual traffic brokerage prior to a few months.”

Defendant

B After completing the above phone, C had a criminal record that “A would receive an investigation as if he/she operated the business, and request it to receive it is difficult to do so,” and caused C to feel a false confession by saying “A will be dealt with after being investigated.”

Thus, Defendant A and B had C prepare a false statement to the head of the Busan Franchi Police Station affiliated with the Busan Franchi Police Station, who was called the above business establishment around that time, to the effect that “the principal was engaged in sexual traffic intermediary business as the proprietor of the business by leasing his officetel.”

As a result, Defendant A and B instigated C to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

3. Defendant C’s criminal escape also constitutes an officetel around July 31, 2014.