Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and a fine of up to two million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were in line with each other, and Defendant A was in line with each other in the business of operating a Mad’s Mad’s Mad’s Mad’ from the first floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B was an employee of the above business establishment, and the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic by providing the guest rooms of the above marina business place as a place of sexual traffic around November 2019.

At around November 22, 2019, the Defendants employed sexual traffic women E, and had two police officers who pretended to find the above business place at the above location, receive 180,000 won as the price for sexual traffic and have them attend the sexual intercourse in the smuggling room.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1.D Cinematographic CDs on November 11.

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing factors indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., under the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the factors of sentencing as stated in the arguments of this case

In relation to the crime of this case, Defendant A is more responsible as the owner of a sexual traffic business establishment.

Defendant

B has committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution for the same crime, and the same crime has been committed.

Defendant

A also has three times of punishment for a crime of the same kind.

The defendants have led to the confession of the facts of the crime.

The Defendants seem to have committed crimes under economic and social difficult circumstances.