Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months, and by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of a marina business establishment that has no trade name in Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is the employee of the relevant marina business establishment.

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or coerce sexual traffic for business purposes, or receive money, valuables and other financial benefits, and promise to engage in sexual traffic.

The Defendants conspired with Defendant A from November 25, 2016 to December 15, 2016, and from March 20, 2017 to March 20, 2017, Defendant B arranged sexual traffic for business purposes several times by installing seven smugglings and a simplified shower box at the above marina business establishment and receiving KRW 90,00 from customers who find the place as the price for sexual traffic, and allowing female employees, such as D, to engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Written statements of D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of the detailed statement of each account transaction, each field photograph, and statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 30 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. Attraction of a workhouse (Defendant B) Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order (Defendant A) Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. (Defendant A) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the scope of recommendations] is that there is no person who is subject to special sentencing [the person who is subject to the sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (in the case of Defendant A] (the decision of sentence] [the fact that there is a history of punishment as a fine for the brokerage of sexual traffic conducted at the same place, the crime of this case is repeated, the direct sexual intercourse is committed, and the degree of participation in Defendant B is somewhat minor.