logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.04.19 2018고단245
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for aiding and abetting fraud at the Incheon District Court’s Busan Branch on November 27, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was completed on May 26, 2016 at the Ansan Prison.

[2] On December 8, 2017, the Defendants conspiredd to arrange sexual traffic to many unspecified male customers by using “D”, and, on December 8, 2017, around 02:10, the Defendants received 140,000 won from unspecified male customers under the name of a chemical, and had them engage in sexual traffic, G (the age of 39 and the nationality of Thailand) and sexual traffic.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to act as an intermediary for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Report on internal investigation, report on internal investigation (referring to report on internal investigation, etc.), and report on internal investigation (referring to transfer, etc. to the Chuncheon Immigration Office's post office);

1. Notification of personal transfer of an illegal alien;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (suspect B criminal records, etc.);

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 19 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for each crime;

1. Aggravationd criminal defendant B: Article 35 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who handles concurrent crimes: The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act: Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendants employed a female to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic; the crime is very poor; the act of arranging sexual traffic is not highly likely to harm the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the female sex; thus, there is a need for strict punishment; Defendant A is still under the period of probation and Defendant B commits the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he/she committed the crime even though he/she is a repeated crime period; there is no history of punishment for the same kind of crime.

arrow