logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.11.13 2015고단786
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes.

Defendants conspired to commit the same year from June 8, 2015.

8. From 21:00 on December 21, 200, in the name of "F" located on the fourth floor of the building E E in order to have three straw rooms with the desire and bed, and employ female employees in return for sexual traffic from the male customers in order to receive cash 1-1.20,000 won, female employees and the rest amount shall be the defendants, and the rest amount shall be the defendants shall be the defendants, and the male customers and female employees shall arrange sexual traffic in the smuggling room, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect of G;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Fmination photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant A [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the second category (6 to 1 year) such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts subject to 19 years of age or older (mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts through commercial sex acts, giving and receiving, etc.) [decision of sentence] is contrary to mistake. However, considering that there are many criminal records of the same kind, and that the latter committed the second case even during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, it is inevitable to sentence sentence.

In addition, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case.

2. Defendant B [the scope of recommendations] No basic area (6-1 and 4 months) of the type of sexual traffic in which he/she is aged 19 years or older, such as arranging sexual traffic, etc. (such as arranging sexual traffic by giving and receiving business prices, etc.).

arrow