Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 00:12 on June 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the Suwon-si, Suwon-si B and 4 of Suwon-si, and received domestic violence 112 reports and controlled the Defendant; (b) “A police officer belonging to the Suwon-gu, Police Station C of the Suwon-gu, Police Station of the Republic of Korea: “I am knife and knife the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife at one time; and (c) on the same day, I am knife knife knife knife knife knif.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D or E;

1. A written statement;

1. Photographs of a police officer at the scene of dispatch, and photographs of damaged police officers at the scene of dispatch;

1. Application of investigation reports (on-site related to documentary evidence images) and statutes governing documentary video CDs in the field;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed assault against a police officer who conducts a duty to prevent and investigate domestic violence of the defendant by putting in prison his/her duty, thereby impairing public authority with regard to the enforcement of the Act.

The time when the defendant gets the police officers to take a trial fee and desire to exercise the tangible power is not short, and the degree of insult accompanied by violence is not easy.

However, prior to the instant case, the Defendant did not have any previous conviction and faithfully.