Defendant

A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 1,000,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 9, 2016, the Defendants: G, an employee of the place where the Defendants were located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and G, who had a dispute about drinking alcohol at the said place; G, who was in receipt of a 112 report, and the head of the police station H district of the Suwon-gu, the police station from among the water sources dispatched to the site; Defendant A, while taking a bath, she was able to walk the above I’s Hebbbbbbucks at once, walking the Habbbbucks of the said district; Defendant B continued to see the her chest’s chest belonging to the said police officer on one occasion; Defendant B, who was in the said district, used the above her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son; and Defendant B’s her her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to J, I, M, L, or K;

1. Written statements of N,O and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the standing photographs of police officers dispatched to the scene;

1. Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that several police officers for the reason of sentencing of the order of provisional payment interfere with official duties by exercising assault against the police officers, taking into account the criminal intent, the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances of the defendants, etc