Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 10:50 on December 18, 2016, at a restaurant, “E in a restaurant,” and “the Defendant ” in a restaurant.

The victim G, who belongs to the Suwon-gu Police Station F District G, which was called the above restaurant upon the report of 112, requested the victim G to lower the voice of the defendant, which was called the "G, etc." should have an assistant principal, and this kind of son, who was sent to the above restaurant, is the leader of the Suwon-gu Police Station.

‘Absently, G grandchildren were pushed down several times and assaulted only once by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

2. The Defendant: (a) was arrested as a current offender on the same facts as the above-mentioned 1; (b) was compelled to go to the F District of the police station in the Southern East-gu Police Station in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si and waiting at the F District; (c) on December 18, 2016, the Defendant 1 followed the police officer’s control at the above place, and she fluored the victim I, who was the victim of the F District, and fluored the victim’s left kne kne, and flus the victim’s kne kne, who was walking at one time.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Investigation report (E on-site ctV investigation), investigation report (ctv video within the F District);

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes to Chapter 2;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed an assault against a police officer who puts his/her duty in prison, thereby impairing the public authority with respect to the enforcement of the law.

The Defendant, in particular, is one’s own.