logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 05. 31. 선고 2017두36724 판결
(심리불속행) 부동산소유권이전등기가 명의신탁이라는 점에 대한 증명책임은 주장하는 자에게 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-34785 ( January 25, 2017),

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2014 Medium-990 (Law No. 126, 2014)

Title

(Incompetence of Trial) The burden of proving that the registration of real estate ownership is a title trust exists to the claimant.

Summary

(The gist of the original trial) In the event of a title trust of real estate, if the title truster transfers the real estate at his own will and the income from such transfer belongs to the title truster, the burden of proving that there is another person who actually obtains income from the transfer of the real estate, since the ownership transfer registration was based on the title trust.

Related statutes

Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act Article 162 (Time of Transfer or Acquisition)

Cases

2017-Du-36724 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

o Head of the tax office

The second instance decision

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu34785 Decided January 25, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

May 31, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices

arrow