logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 02. 28. 선고 2017두69533 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 토지의 양도는 명의신탁을 입증할 수 없어 양도소득세 부과는 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2015Nu13725 ( November 08, 2017)

Title

(D) The transfer of the land of this case is legitimate because it is not possible to prove the title trust.

Summary

(1) In the event that the title truster transfers real estate to a third party and the transfer income was attributed to the title truster under the substance over form principle, the person liable to pay the tax under the substance over form principle bears the burden of proof. As such, the transfer of land in this case lacks objective evidence of title trust and cannot be otherwise proven, the initial imposition disposition of the capital gains tax is lawful.

Related statutes

Article 14 (Real Taxation)

Cases

2017Du69533 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

00

Defendant-Appellee

00. Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court 2015Nu13725

Imposition of Judgment

November 08, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the argument on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to include or not accept the grounds of appeal under the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow