logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.08.13 2013고정1131
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2004, victim Korea National Housing Corporation (the Korea Land Corporation was changed to Korea Land Corporation after its merger with Korea Land Corporation) developed land of 1,750,000 square meters (529,00 square meters) located in Singu-si, Sinnam-dong, Seonam-dong, Busan-dong, and water king-dong (529,000 square meters) and publicly announced the designation and public inspection of the above area as a planned area for the housing site development project, the main purpose of which is to build the apartment houses and detached houses of 11,202 households, and as part of the measures to move and live in the above zone, from March 28, 2004 to the first compensation commencement date, the owner or tenant who resided in the housing (including an unauthorized house) in the above project zone from March 28, 2004 to the first compensation commencement date, who is removed by the project, paid the national rental housing right of 60 square meters or less to the

The Defendant, who became aware of such circumstances, acquired an embankment installed in a plastic house located in Silung City C from D, which is a blorder specialized in the sale of 'bbbbbbing area', and tried to obtain a victim's compensation for obstacles and a right to move into a national rental house, by driving as if he had been residing in the river from this day, as he had been holding the embankment from that place.

1. The Defendant in collusion with D, E, and F in order, and around October 9, 2007, in a vinyl installed in C, a plastic house established in C, a public announcement of the project approval of the said tree site development zone, the Defendant did not have resided therein before January 18, 2007, which was the public announcement of the project approval of the said tree site development zone, and did not own the bank, the Defendant issued a false certificate of obstacle ownership in F, which was prepared in the name of F, stating that the Defendant actually resided and owned the bank from before March 28, 2004, three months prior to the date of the designation and public inspection of the said tree site development zone.

arrow