1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Examine test" in the main sentence of the first instance judgment No. 4, No. 9, No. 17, and No. 18, and No. 7 shall be deemed as "factory acceptance test"; "No. 29, Jan. 29, 2012" in the fourth 11 as "No. 5, Dec. 29, 2013"; "Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" in the fifth 2, 3, and 22 pages 2 as "former Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party (Amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016)"; "No. 5, No. 3,4, and 22 of the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Procedure Act shall be deemed as "No. 26, the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" and "No. 5, 2016 of the Enforcement Rule of the Civil Procedure Act (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 5)" as "No. 365,". 5.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.