[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and Articles 9 through 16.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 7, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution for violating the Housing Act at Suwon District Court on September 15, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 15, 2015. On October 12, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Housing Act and 2 years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2017.

Defendant

C On October 15, 2018, the Busan District Court sentenced 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with labor for violating the Housing Act and 3 years of suspended execution on October 23, 2018, which became final and conclusive on October 23, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

No person shall transfer or acquire, or mediate any deed or status corresponding to the status eligible for a supply of housing to acquire a supply of housing built and supplied under the Housing Act, or have others acquire it, and shall not acquire or have others acquire a supply of deed, status or housing built and supplied under the Housing Act by fraudulent or other unlawful means.

In cases where a housing supply business entity selects occupants, it shall be selected according to the order determined by the regulations on housing supply in general, but according to the so-called "general supply" method in which occupants are selected by lot if competition exists in the same order of priority. However, "special supply" can be made to persons with disabilities, persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State, discharged soldiers discharged from long-term service, etc. within a certain scope. In the case of an apartment building constructed on the location that meets the conditions of the location, the winning rate of special supply is too high due to the strong competition among the occupants due to

Defendant

A is not a person with a disability who is not a person with a disability, but is not a person with a disability to apply for special supply of the apartment complex under the name of the person with a disability recruited by Defendant B, the role of leading all crimes, such as application for special sale in the name of the person with a disability, and the role of Defendant B in contact with the person with a disability who was aware