logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.05.24 2012고단1438
신용협동조합법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who won an election for the president of the E-credit Cooperatives located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, which was implemented on January 19, 2012.

No one shall offer, express an intention to offer, or promise to offer money, goods, entertainment, other economic benefits, or a public or private job to any elector for the purpose of getting him/her elected, or making another person elected, or not elected as an executive of a cooperative.

Nevertheless, around January 11, 2012, the Defendant provided 1 soldier’s disease at “H Health Center,” operated by the elector G in Daegu-gun: “H Health Center,” saying, “I have left the place of directors at low president. I have left the place of directors, and I have my request. I have come to the place of directors,” and provided 1 soldier’s disease at which the market price cannot be ascertained (2.4km).

As a result, the defendant provided goods to the elector for the purpose of election.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s assertion that he did not know G and did not know that he did not have any H health center, nor provided G with one disease.

B. (1) Determination (1) As to the facts charged in this case, the statement from G police to this court and I are examined by telephone, and the summary of the investigation report on the preparation of prosecution assistant police officer, stating the gist thereof.

However, the above investigation report is not admissible as evidence by the defendant, and it is difficult to recognize the credibility of G's statement in light of the circumstances below.

(A) G stated in the police and the prosecution for the following purposes:

From 10 to 20:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on the election day, the first day of this day, when the Defendant was seated on a knife knife on the knife knife’s knife and asked the house, and thereafter, the Defendant added one copy of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife at 10:30 a.m. to knife knife knife.

arrow