logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2015.06.24 2015고단332
공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was elected as a candidate for the election of the president of the D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) partnership held on March 11, 2015.

1. Violation of the Commissioned Elections Act;

(a) No person who provides money shall provide money to an elector, etc. for an election campaign;

Nevertheless, on December 2014, the Defendant issued KRW 500,000 to 7 members of the said Suscopic Union, a FF member of G, a member of the said Suscopic Union E, in the residence of G, a member of the said Suscopic Union, who is a member of the said Suscopic Association, and issued KRW 50,000 in cash, from that time to March 2015, the Defendant requested support from 7 members of the said Suscopic Union, such as the list of crimes, and provided KRW 2 million in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant provided money to the members for election campaign purposes.

B. On February 2015, the Defendant expressed his/her intent to provide money to the Defendant, at the office of “I” located in He/she was sent KRW 300,000 in cash to the J, who is a member of the said Suhyup, for the commission of “I” to support him/her, who is a member of the said Suhyup, for election. However, the said J refused to receive money.

Accordingly, the defendant expressed his intention to provide money to the members for the purpose of election campaign.

2. No person who violates the Fisheries Cooperatives Act shall provide money, etc. to any elector for the purpose of winning an election as an executive of a fisheries cooperative;

Nevertheless, on June 2014 or July 201, the Defendant issued KRW 500,000 in cash twice by requesting the members to “absing to engage in an election campaign, going through drinking and booming to the union members,” at L’s residence, which is a member of K.

Accordingly, the defendant provided money to the elector for the purpose of winning the election for the head of the D association.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Prosecutions and police suspect interrogation records of the accused;

1. Prosecutions with respect to L.

arrow