A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Support on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On December 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the same crime in the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a D-in car under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.01% of the blood alcohol concentration in the section of about 500 meters from the high fest ground of the members of Ansan-si to the roads front of the terminal 612 distance from the high fright road of the members of Ansan-si to the same city without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant was asked to present a driver’s license for an official document at the same time and time as in paragraph 1, and as in paragraph 1, from the head E of the police station belonging to the transportation management department of the Ansan Police Station for drinking without a license for driving a motor vehicle.

The defendant, who was in possession, presented a first-class large driver's license for F in the name of the commissioner of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, which is an official document, and presented it as the defendant's driver's license.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and time as paragraph (1), when stating personal information by regulating driving under influence of alcohol at a place, making it difficult to clarify the fact of driving without a license, and without authority, stated “F” in the signature column of the report on the results of the influence of alcohol driving and the report on the situation of driving under influence of alcohol without authority to inform and exercise the Defendant’s representative director’s personal information, and forged F’s private signature. A police officer E, who may not know of the fact, submitted to E a police officer a written report on the results of the influence of alcohol driving and a report on the situation of driving under influence of alcohol, stating the forged private signature.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the F's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;