logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고단2745
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 11, 201, the Defendant was under the influence of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) around 23:30 on May 11, 201, driving a vehicle with a volume of 500 meters from the border of Dongdaemun-gu in Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu to 466 meters of alcohol content without a driver’s license.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. At around 00:12 on May 12, 201, the Defendant: (a) was found to have been aware of drinking and unlicensed driving at the above location; (b) then, without authority, forged a letter of confirmation of “Notification on the Result of Drinking Driving Regulations”, which is a private document pertaining to the certification, by stating the name of E, who is a relative, in the column for the driver of the “Notification on the Result of Drinking Driving Regulations” in the PDA for the purpose of exercising the authority; and (c) granted a letter of confirmation of “Notification on the Result of Drinking Driving Regulations”, which is a private document forged as above, to a slope F without knowledge of such fact.

B. On May 12, 201, at around 00:30 on May 12, 201, the Defendant: (a) 105-34, the Dongdaemun Police Station’s session of Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 105-34, controlled the blood alcohol concentration by drinking driving, etc., and demanded the measurement of blood alcohol concentration; (b) stated the written confirmation of the said written statement on the so-called friendly E, written “E” in the written verification on the so-called written statement on the so-called friendly E; and (c) forged a copy of the written confirmation of the so-called “E” in the written confirmation on the so-called “E” without any authority, and exercised it by issuing the written confirmation on the so-called “E” report to F, a private document, which is a private document.

3. When the Defendant, as seen above at the above temporary location, has prevented criminal punishment by drinking alcohol and driving without a license, the Defendant asked E, who is pro-friendly, not the Defendant, to make a false statement at the police station, and requested E, who is not the Defendant, to make a false statement. This is with the traffic of the Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station on May 17, 201.

arrow