Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The facts charged in this case

A. At around 02:30 on July 17, 2015, Defendant B, who was on the top of the steering line of CA car and continued to drive a road front of the E convenience store located in F Dopopool D on several occasions, Defendant B expressed the victim A, who was a driver of F si, “I am on the front of the vehicle and set up the vehicle immediately before I am.” On several occasions, the victim abused the victim by taking advantage of the said cab and driving the said cab on several occasions.

B. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, place specified in the above paragraph (a), and at the victim B’s above act, assaulted the victim at one time by scaming the victim’s right-hand scam, scambling the victim’s scam.

2. Each of the facts charged against the Defendants is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

Defendants do not want to punish each other in this Court.

As such, the prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.