logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고정572
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall report any false crime or accident to a public official.

Nevertheless, at around 23:36 April 10, 2020, the Defendant posted a telephone at the situation room of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency from 112 via his mobile phone from Gangdong-gu Seoul District Court, and reported to the public official for 15 times from that time to April 12, 2020 as follows: “I will sell the name within the EF and know that I will know more severe dynamics than n.e., 1 to 6,8, and 16.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the 112 Reporting Report List to the accused;

1. Article 3 (3) 2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. No person who outlines the facts charged shall file a false report on any crime or accident to a public official;

Nevertheless, around 16:24 on April 11, 2020, the Defendant sent a phone to the situation room of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency through 112 with his own cell phone from Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Bpublic notice source C, and falsely reported it to public officials as shown in the [Attachment 7] list of crimes.

2. Where there is an application for permission to amend a bill of indictment to withdraw all the facts charged among several substantially concurrent charges with judgment, if it is evident that such application is to revoke the indictment, then the application shall be deemed to have been revoked, even if it does not have the form of application for revocation of the prosecution.

Supreme Court Decision 201Da4448 delivered on March 2, 198

arrow