A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall report falsely to a public official any crime or accident that has not been reported.

1. On March 20, 2019, the Defendant filed a report to the effect that “In spite of the fact that the birth of the Defendant was mentally ill-brupted or that there was no harassment from the dynamics, the Defendant filed a report to the effect that “if the birth is in short of the spirit of the birth, it would have the same harassment to the people of the same age.”

2. On March 21, 2019, around 15:02, the Defendant reported to the effect that the Defendant called to the 1119 situation room at the Defendant’s residence located in the Net City B, 2019, to the effect that “Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was not in a state with no mind of drinking water exemption, the Defendant reported to the effect that “it shall be free from drinking water to the East E residing in the C apartment D, and that the Defendant is not mentally ill.”

As a result, the defendant filed a false report to a public official on a crime or accident not over twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the record of statement by reference witness E prepared in the police station with partial statement of the defendant, the record of crackdown on the statement by reference witness, the record of 112 reported cases, the statement of monetary tax returns, the report of internal investigation (with respect to any false report, etc.), and the report of internal investigation (related to

1. The Defendant contests the facts charged to the effect that the Defendant did not file a false report under Article 3(3)2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3(3) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (elective of fines) regarding criminal facts. However, the Defendant reported 22 times during the period from March 20, 2019 to March 21, 2019, respectively, on the phone page 112, and 119, respectively, on the ground that he/she does not contact with the East and East, and the Defendant’s repeated report is deemed to have been requested to confirm the safety of the East and East, and the two reports mentioned in the facts charged are considered to have been made simply by E.