The punishment of defendants shall be three years.

217,00,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

From August 1, 1991, the Defendant served as C and affiliated D with the Seoul Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office. From April 1, 2012 to March 2016, the Defendant worked as the branch head of the F Branch of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu Office E branch of the Public Transport and Social Services Union E branch from around April 1, 2012.

around March 2012, the Defendant already aggravated financial standing, such as preventing the so-called return of personal debt, etc., and had people receive money under the pretext of obtaining employment from public institutions such as official duties of the Gu office, etc. or allowing people to purchase rental apartments by paying a premium to the employees in order to meet financial standing.

1. The Defendant, in violation of the law, discovered that G’s fraud, a Ddong fee, wanting to be employed by the public agencies such as the Gu office, etc. around March 2012, the Defendant told G to be employed in the office of Nowon-gu.

The defendant around May 9, 2012, at the Korean non-exclusive park located in the sub-dong Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the defendant is entitled to participate in the employment of the branch of the D Trade Union and the staff of the Gu office.

The phrase "a request for 10,000,000 won is made as the progress cost to deliver the upper line, such as a person in charge of employment of the Gu office, to the upper line of the city office, with the street funds," which can allow a person to be employed in the office of the office of the Nowon-gu.

G beliefing that the horses were 10,000,000 won in cash on that day.

However, the president of the branch of the D Trade Union did not have any authority to employ employees of the Gu office, such as driving, and the defendant did not know about the procedure for employing employees, and did not know about the person in charge of employment.

The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to actually use the Defendant’s personal debt or to actually employ the Defendant, even if the Defendant received money for the purpose of employment-related expenses, such as the repayment of the Defendant’s personal debt or living expenses, due to the lack of financial standing to prevent the Defendant from returning his/her personal debt at the time.

The defendant.